Mostrando las entradas con la etiqueta agamben. Mostrar todas las entradas
Mostrando las entradas con la etiqueta agamben. Mostrar todas las entradas
miércoles, junio 18, 2014
el animal desempleado, dixit Agamben
miércoles, marzo 12, 2014
el animal sabático, dixit agamben
![]() |
| Retrato de Agamben como una criatura de muchos brazos. |
Human life is inoperative and without purpose, but precisely this argia and this absence of aim make the incomparable operativity of the human species possible. Man has dedicated himself to production and labor [lavoro], because in his essence he is completely devoid of work [opera], because he is the Sabbatical animal par excellence...This inoperativity is the political substance of the Occident, the glorious nutrient of all power. For this reason festival and idleness return ceaselessly in the dreams and political utopias of the Occident and are equally incessantly shipwrecked there. They are the enigmatic relics that the economic-theological machine abandons on the water’s edge of civilization and that each time men question anew, nostalgically and in vain. Nostalgically because they appear to contain something that belongs to the human essence, but in vain because really they are nothing but the waste products of the immaterial and glorious fuel burnt by the motor of the machine as it turns, and that cannot be stopped.
Giorgio Agamben, The Kingdom and the Glory
viernes, octubre 18, 2013
El misterio es el angel, el ministro, el policía, dixit Agamben
![]() |
| Agamben de cabeza y con las manos alzadas para protegerse del golpe. |
Through these distinctions the entire economic-providential
apparatus (with its polarities ordinatio/executio, providence/fate, Kingdom/Government) is passed on
as an unquestioend inheritance to modern politics. What was needed to assure
the unity of being and divine action, reconciling the unity of
substance with the trinity of persons and the government of particulars with
the universality of providence, has here the strategic function of reconciling
the sovereignty and generality of the law with the public economy and the
effective government of individuals. The most nefarious consequence of this
theological apparatus dressed up as political legitimation is that it has
rendered the democratic tradition incapable of thinking government and its
economy (today one would instead write: economy and its government, but the two
terms are substantially synonymous). On the one hand, Rousseau conceives of
government as the essential political problem; on the other hand, he minimizes
the problem for its nature and its foundation, reducing it to the activity of
the execution of sovereign authority. The ambiguity that seems to settle the
problem of government by presenting it as the mere execution of a general will
and law has weighed negatively not only upon the theory, but also upon the
history of modern democracy. For this history is nothing but the progressive
coming to light of the substantial untruth of the primacy of legislative power
and the consequent irreducibility of government to mere execution. And if today
we are witnessing the government and the economy's overwhelming domination of a
popular sovereignty emptied of all meaning, this perhaps signifies that
Occidental democracies are paying the political price of a theological
inheritance that they had unwittingly assumed through Rousseau.
Giorgio Agamben, The Kingdom and the Glory.
Suscribirse a:
Entradas (Atom)


